Author Archives: Amy Wicker

“Buttons for a Cure” Initiative Launched to Raise Awareness and Funds for Food Allergy Cure

January, 12, 2016 — AllergySafeTravel, an online travel resource, announces the launch of their new “Buttons for a Cure” campaign to raise awareness about the growing number of individuals who suffer from life-threatening food allergies.  AST Founder and President Amy Wicker says the newly launched initiative serves several purposes – to make people aware of how prevalent food allergies have become, and to reassure food allergic individuals that help is nearby if they were to experience a severe allergic reaction.

The initiative includes buttons, stickers and car magnets that say “I’m Allergy Aware”. Again, the purpose is to let allergy sufferers know that any person wearing a button/sticker or using a vehicle magnet knows how to use an epinephrine auto-injector.

“Can you imagine how a food allergic child might feel if he walks into a classroom and sees his teacher wearing a button that says “I’m Allergy Aware”, said Wicker, whose own daughter suffers from severe dairy and nut allergies.  “It makes a huge statement and would help to alleviate any anxiety about being in a new or different environment.”

The buttons are ideal for food allergy parents and/or relatives, school nurses, teachers, or anyone else who has first-hand knowledge of food allergies or who has received food allergy training.

All funds raised through the sale of the buttons will be used to support the work of Dr. Xiu-Min Li, one of this country’s leading food allergy researchers, whose groundbreaking research looks at the therapeutic effects of Chinese herbs on food allergy.

Food allergies impact almost every school across the United States. Nearly 6 million children in the U.S. – which equates to 1 in 13, or roughly 2 in every classroom – have a food allergy.  Studies indicate that 16-18% of school-age children who have food allergies have had a reaction in school. In addition, in approximately 25% of the reactions that occur at school, the student had not yet been diagnosed with food allergy.

The buttons, which have a magnetic closure, are being sold through AllergySafeTravel’s sister company, PardonMOI, for $5 each.

To learn more about Dr. Li’s exciting work, check out Henry Ehrlich’s book Traditional Chinese Medicine, Western Science, and the Search for a Cure.  His books are available for purchase on Amazon.






Time to Take a Stand on Airline Access to Emergency Epinephrine Legislation

October 28, 2015 — As many of you know, airline travel with severe nut allergies is an issue that is near and dear to my heart.  My 10-year-old daughter had an airborne reaction to nuts on a plane five years ago.  I’ve been working on this issue since then, and needless to say, I’m pleased at the attention this issue is now receiving.

I had some input on the task force which is now spearheading this legislative effort, the Airline Access to Emergency Epinephrine (Senate Bill 1972), which calls for the airlines to carry epinephrine auto-injectors on board all flights and flight crew training.   These measures, which are desperately needed, will no doubt help save lives.  I’m also pleased that this legislation calls for a report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) that looks at the airlines’ food allergy policies and the incidentce rates of onboard reactions and emergency landings.  Policies won’t change until we have this data, and, at present, the airlines aren’t required to give it.

Take note that during the summer of 2014, there were four anaphylactic reactions on board flights during a three month period.  How many have we heard about this year?  None.  Is it possible that there weren’t any reactions on board flights this year?  Highly doubtful.

Earlier this spring for example, United Airlines had to make two emergency landings due medical emergencies involving children.  I made repeated phone calls to the company to find out the cause of the medical emergencies.  Officials were unavailable for comment.  Again, the FAA doesn’t require airlines to report the reasons behind their medical emergencies.

Since we don’t have any scientific evidence to indicate risks associated with flying with nut allergies, the only thing we’re left with is anecdotal evidence. This doesn’t carry the weight we need to make our case. As a result, there is no incentive for the airlines to change the way they do things. That’s why it is so important for us to have the GAO report which will force the airlines to release this information.

What I find most disappointing about this legislation is that it doesn’t call for on- board announcements warning about nut allergies.  I think it’s a simple request really, but the medical advisory boards of the food allergy organizations won’t support announcements because despite the anecdotal evidence we’re seeing, there’s no perceived scientific evidence.  I simply wish a few of them had been on that flight with us five years ago.

We can’t let this issue disappear.  When the time comes, and we’ve got more information with which to work with, we’ll move forward with the steps that need to be taken to reduce on-board reactions.   At the very least, the next step should be requiring that announcements be made about the potential for serious food allergic reactions.  Can’t we all agree that it would be easier to prevent a reaction than to treat one?

Please write your senators and congressmen asking them to support Senate Bill 1972 — it’s a small step in the right direction.

As always, Safe Travels —


On a side note, there are a couple of steps you can take when flying to alert passengers that you’ve got a severe allergy.   My daughter came up with her own “Certificate of Appreciation” card that she passes out to other passengers explaining her allergies.  I also wear a bright red sash that says “Airborne Nut Allergies – Please Don’t Eat Nuts Around Me” which can be ordered online through the Sash Company.

Top10                Elyse certificate of appreciation first name only

2015: A Life Changing Year for Me but One Filled with Promise

September 29, 2015

Have you ever had one of those years where you want to climb under a rock and stay there for a good long time? Well, this year happens to be my year to climb under that rock. We all like to think that we have some morsel of control over life, but when tragedy strikes, or our loved ones fall ill, we realize how precarious life is and within seconds everything can change.

The year started off as most do with a long to-do list and New Year’s resolutions. But little did I know what was ahead of us. On January 12, my brother’s 54th birthday, we gathered at his bedside to say goodbye as he lay unconscious and dying. My brother Fritz had just undergone cancer treatment a week earlier and had returned home to recuperate. His body was so weak from the cancer treatment that he blacked out twice and hit his head both times. Since he had been on blood thinners to reduce the likelihood of a stroke, he developed a brain bleed which couldn’t be stopped. It was heart wrenching to say the least. As we gathered around his bedside, we played one of his favorite songs, “Landslide, by Stevie Nicks. Within seconds, he passed.

My mom, trying to be as stoic as ever, kept saying “I can’t imagine how horrible this is for parents who lose a young child, at least I had him for 54 years.” She repeatedly said this, and each time she did, I found myself leaving the room.

Losing a child, even one at 54, is too painful to contemplate. Yes, cancer is a horrible disease and can come with little warning. So while I don’t want to equate food allergies with cancer, a severe food allergic reaction can occur with little warning. Each day I try not to think about the fact that I could lose my daughter to something so ubiquitous as milk or cashews.

Exactly three weeks later, I returned to the same hospital–same intensive care unit– to a room just across the hall from where my brother had died. This time I had come to say goodbye to my brother-in-law, Tom, who at the age of 63 was dying; the result of lung disease and pneumonia. Seriously, life was now being cruel. He died exactly three weeks to the day after my brother.

As we all tried to move forward through the grief, my mother then fell seriously ill with the flu and had to be hospitalized for nearly a week. For a time, we wondered whether the flu and her grief were going to get the best of her. We didn’t have the emotional capacity to say goodbye to yet another family member. Fortunately, she didn’t have any preexisting medical conditions so she was able to fight the illness. We know that had she had any other health issues, she most likely wouldn’t have made it through. She’s made a remarkable recovery, but again, we’re not taking anything for granted this year. Since her illness, three other close family members have been hospitalized due to serious infections. Truly, what gives? Is anyone else having this kind of year?

While I was ready to write this year off and skip to 2016 as quickly as possible, we had what I consider a true miracle. As many of you are aware, my 10-year-old daughter has severe dairy and nut allergies. She’s had trace amounts of dairy which has caused her to go into anaphylaxis. She’s had close calls with cashews. She’s reacted to airborne nut proteins on a plane. I don’t know what possessed me, perhaps I’m still not functioning at 100 percent, but I let my allergist convince me that it was time for a peanut challenge. She had done a peanut component test which indicated that Elyse would not likely go into anaphylaxis if exposed. I agreed.

The day came, Elyse was calm and I was anything but that. Since she has asthma, I asked the allergist to simply open a can of peanuts and place it under her nose to make sure that she wouldn’t have any asthma issues if she inhaled the airborne peanut particles. We opened the can and waited. Nothing happened. No reaction. We kept moving forward, and after spending five hours in the allergist’s office and consuming nearly four tablespoons of peanut butter, the allergist declared that Elyse was no longer allergic to peanuts.

OMG! I consider it a gift of life. For ten years, we’ve avoided peanuts, peanut butter and anything peanut related. Now, all of a sudden, peanuts no longer pose a threat. Again, I wish I could describe to you the mental adjustment this kind of outcome requires. It’s not been easy, but it is liberating.

Needless to say, my world has certainly changed this year. My family no longer looks or feels the same. While I miss my brother and brother-in-law dearly, I’m more mindful of celebrating the victories, and Elyse’s victory is one I will be celebrating for years to come. While she no longer has to be fearful when she sits next to a person eating a peanut butter and jelly sandwich, we still have two more big ones to go: milk and cashew. But I’m more committed than ever to see that we find a cure for food allergies. To that end, we’ll be announcing a new initiative soon so stay tuned for more to come. There would be nothing better than to create a world where food allergies don’t exist.

Sometimes, from tragedy comes hope. Let’s give hope to millions of families grappling with severe food allergies with a first step in stemming the tide.

Safe Travels –


Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Against United Airlines

Summer 2015 –

A California woman loses her court battle against United Airlines that stemmed from a life-threatening allergic reaction she had on board a flight. In May, a U.S. District Court judge in Sacramento threw out the claims that Alisa Gleason had filed stating that her charges of negligence, emotional distress and breach of contract were preempted by the Airline Dergulation Act, a 1978 federal law that removed government control over the airlines. In his ruling, Judge Morrison England wrote that Gleason’s claims relate to the services of an air carrier and are therefore preempted by the Airline Dereguation Act.

Gleason, who has a life-threatening peanut allergy, boarded a flight from Florida to Chicago on United Airlines on May 28, 2011. Before the flight, she asked United employees to make an announcement for passengers to refrain from eating peanuts on the flight; United agreed. However, once on the plane, United crewmembers on the flight refused to make that announcement as promised. In fact, one flight attendant allegedly said to her, “What do you want me to do about it?” when she told him she had a peanut allergy.

One hour into the flight, Ms. Gleason started experiencing an allergic reaction. She had noticed that someone four rows behind her was eating peanuts. She took Benadryl and an inhaler to no avail and her reaction worsened. She went to the bathroom, and a flight attendant ordered her out. She took out her inhaler, and allegedly was told by the flight attendant to put away the “nail polish” because the odor might disturb other passengers. Flight attendants and a passenger who was a nurse told the pilot that Ms. Gleason may not survive all the way to Chicago, which was 40-45 minutes away, as she was lapsing in and out of consciousness and experiencing stridor. The pilot made an emergency landing in Missouri. Ms. Gleason was treated at a hospital in Missouri for two days in intensive care.

Although the judge dismissed the lawsuit, United nevertheless received a lot of negative publicity, especially in the food allergy community. A few lessons can be learned to prevent such an incident like this in the future. First, if a passenger is showing signs of an allergic reaction, make sure the passenger is treated with epinephrine as soon as possible. Every on-board medical kit has epinephrine. Early treatment can mean the difference between life and death and can often prevent the situation from becoming worse or dire.

Second, treat the allergic passenger with respect. Food allergy is a recognized disability by the Department of Transportation, so treat them with the same care as any other disabled passenger. Showing kindness and compassion can go a long way. Lawsuits are often brought because a person feels mistreated, and studies show that a little bit of kindness can often discourage a lawsuit.

Lastly, be consistent. If your airline has an allergy policy, make sure it is enforced. Make sure the customer service representatives know the policy in addition to every other crew member so that their promises are followed through by the flight crew. The seeming randomness of how policies are enforced or not enforced contributes to the passengers’ frustration and makes them more likely to take action against the airline.

By: Laurel Francoeur, Attorney and Founder of the Allergy Law Project, an advocacy group for individuals with food allergies. Author of “Flying with Food Allergies”.

Calls to Protect Allergic Airline Passengers Fail to Trigger Legislative Action in Britain

Summer 2015 –

Traveling by plane with allergies to tree nuts or peanuts can be a tricky issue, often requiring a standing battle plan. That could mean booking flights in advance, researching airline allergy policies, wiping down seats and trays with alcohol pads and packing doses of self-injectable epinephrine in case of an allergic reaction. But should the burden of preventing a severe allergic reaction be the sole responsibility of passengers?

This question was brought to the forefront as Ian Paisley Jr, a member of the Parliament, who called for a change in British law that would require all passengers arriving or leaving the UK to be informed when a passenger with nut allergies is on board a flight. Unfortunately, Paisley was only able to bring awareness to the issue during an adjournment debate at the House of Commons, and was not able trigger any legislative action.

But that did not stop one of his constituents from campaigning about the threat of food borne allergens on flights.  Coming in contact with these nuts can have deadly consequences that include going into anaphylactic shock, a multi-organ allergic reaction, which could lead to difficulty breathing and death.

Helena Erwin, whose daughter suffers from a severe nut allergy, contacted Paisley after her family dealt with flight crews who were unresponsive to her pleas to make an announcement of her daughter’s allergies.

On February 9, Paisley delivered a speech informing members of the House of Commons that the UK does not have a consistent approach in notifying passengers about food allergy warnings onboard.

In response to Paisley’s argument, Robert Goodwill, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport responded that “The Government would need to be certain that the benefits of introducing any new regulation, such as a requirement for airlines to make a pre-flight announcement, was proportionate, and would have a significant impact in terms of risk reduction.”  The core argument made by opponents to in-flight allergen announcements is that this legislative action would put an unfair burden on the airline industry.

“We believe this is not an unfair burden, especially since this mode of transportation doesn’t allow passengers with allergies to move away from their triggers or get off the plane when they come into contact with one of their allergens,” said Amy Wicker, president of AllergySafeTravel.

When airlines refuse to make these short announcements, the burden gets placed on passengers like Erwin who often have to begin their polite campaign of explanation and entreaty to other passengers and flight personnel. But without the help of airline officials, these efforts can be futile.

In February, a British family wasn’t allowed to board an American Airlines flight after asking the flight crew to announce their son’s nut allergy. After a flight attendant refused to make the announcement, the family was forced to spend two more nights in Florida figuring out alternative arrangements to travel home.

The failure of legislative action was met with disappointment especially from families who were hoping this action could protect themselves and their loved ones. AllergySafeTravel finds the inaction due to “lack of scientific studies” to be disappointing considering the growing number of anecdotal cases that are now occurring.  Just last summer, there were four cases of anaphylaxis on board flights during a three-month period. One of those cases involved a 4-year-old girl who went into anaphylactic shock and fell unconscious after a passenger ignored the flight crew’s warnings about her deadly allergy. The plane had to make an emergency landing, and the girl had to be revived by an epinephrine auto-injector.

One in 20 British nationals have a food allergy, and recent studies such as the 2013 report from the National Center for Health Statistics have shown food allergies to be on the rise.   The study found that allergic conditions are one of the most prevalent medical issues affecting children today and that the prevalence of food and skin allergies has increased in children under age 18 years.

Paisley’s office could not be reached for comment on future legislative plans.

By Yoona Ha

Airlines Upgrade Safety by Receiving Food Allergy Training

Summer 2015 –

When airline executives now receive disability training, food allergies will be a part of that discussion, thanks to Open Doors, a non-profit advocacy group for people with disabilities.  Due to the growing prevalence of food allergies, the Chicago-based organization began to include the information in its training program beginning in January.

“We have included severe nut allergies in our education programs and recognize that severe nut allergies can be fatal,” said Executive Director Eric Lipp.  “Our approach is to establish a consistent minimum policy that all airlines can follow that calls on them to instruct their flight crews to make an announcement when a passenger has a severe nut allergy.”

Lipp acknowledges that airlines can’t prevent passengers from bringing nuts on board, but says an announcement could discourage passengers from opening nut packages.

“It’s really a shared responsibility.  Passengers with nut allergies should make sure they take all preventive arrangements before boarding, including having an epinephrine auto-injector and wiping down seats from previous passengers.  We are hoping that airlines will step up and establish higher standards when it comes to dealing with severe nut allergies,” added Lipp, who notes that many airlines today routinely include an epinephrine auto-injector in their on-board medical kits.

The organization, founded in 2000, advocates on behalf of all persons with disabilities so that they may have the same consumer opportunities as everyone else. They aspire to teach businesses how to succeed in the disability market, while simultaneously empowering the disability community.

By: David Brimm

My Journey with Airborne Nut Allergies

Summer 2015 –

Five years ago, I boarded a flight from Chicago with my husband and two daughters, one of whom has asthma and life-threatening nut allergies, to attend a family member’s wedding in California.  Twenty minutes after take-off we began smelling nuts—within seconds my daughter started to react.

I grabbed the epinephrine, nebulizer, and Benadryl and started medicating my then 5 year old.  After several terrorizing minutes of not knowing whether she’d go into full anaphylactic shock, her medicine kicked in, and her symptoms slowly subsided.

There are no words to adequately describe my fear of being in the sky at 35,000 feet and watching my daughter react to one of her deadliest allergens.  That day…we got lucky.   What caused my daughter’s reaction—a couple sitting several rows in front of us opened a can of mixed nuts.

We are not alone on this journey of navigating air travel and life-threatening allergies to the inhalation of nut proteins.  There are others who have had similar, even worse, reactions on board flights.

Nearly three years ago, Alisa Gleason of Sacramento went into anaphylactic shock on board a flight when a woman sitting several rows away from her opened a bag of peanuts.  According to published reports, Gleason said as soon as she inhaled the airborne peanut proteins, it felt as though her lungs collapsed.  “Every time you breathe, it closes in and doesn’t open,” she said.  The plane diverted and made an emergency landing in St. Louis where Gleason spent two days in ICU.

Last August, a 4-year-old girl went into anaphylactic shock. On this flight, the flight attendants made repeated announcements about a passenger with life-threatening allergies to peanuts and requested that such products not be opened.  Sadly, a passenger, sitting several rows away from the girl, opened a bag of nuts.  The girl stopped breathing and luckily survived after being revived by epinephrine.

The plane was diverted to make an emergency landing.

While we don’t know exactly how many passengers have had airborne reactions to nuts on airplanes since there are no reporting requirements, there are steps airlines can take to safeguard passengers who have life-threatening allergies to nuts.

  • First, allow affected travelers time to pre-board flights for wiping down seats, seat belts, tray tables, and surrounding areas.  Residue from previous flights can trigger a reaction.
  • Second, make pre-flight announcements requesting passengers to refrain from eating nut products due to passengers with life-threatening nut allergies.  Passengers should be made aware that if nuts are opened and eaten on the aircraft there is a possibility that the plane may need to be diverted from its existing schedule and route to make an emergency landing.
  • Third, establish a nut free section or buffer zone around allergic passengers. (How large that zone needs to be should be determined by nut allergic passenger and flight crew).
  • Finally, carry epinephrine auto-injectors and train flight personnel — Case in point, there’ve been two situations within recent months where medical personnel had difficulty using epinephrine supplied in airline medical kits on individuals who were in anaphylaxis.

While scientific evidence is not where it should be when it comes to proving that airborne reactions to nuts can occur and can have detrimental results, there is some data that reinforces the health impacts of airborne nut allergies.

Leading food allergy researcher Dr. Kari Nadeau of Stanford, says one has to be careful of saying there is “absolutely no risk” of airborne anaphylaxis given the information we have already.  Nadeau points out that data exists from aerochamber studies that may be helpful in determining the risk of airborne reactions.  During these aerochamber studies, people with allergies breathe in certain particles and wait to see when they get symptoms.  According to Nadeau, one can infer some degree of an allergic reaction in the average food allergy patient on an airplane. (Please see information below for specific data)

In November’s Journal of Allergy & Clinical Immunology,  Dr. Hugh Sampson, one of the lead authors of “Food allergy:  A practice parameter update – 2014” states “the primary exposure to a food allergen for most patients is through ingestion, although some patients can exhibit symptoms after skin contact or inhalation of aerosolized protein.”

During a taped interview several years ago, Ann Munoz Furlong, the founder of the Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network (now FARE), discusses the dangers of airborne reactions.  Furlong said individuals have died after inhaling their allergen.  She spoke specifically of one man who died after inhaling shrimp and another girl who died as a result of inhaling chick peas. Munoz said, “if you’ve got people opening nuts on a plane, for some individuals it will cause a reaction.”

Think about the risk of physical exposure to passengers with severe allergies when a passenger is sitting in such close quarters with other passengers.   Case in point, college junior Zac Chelini was sitting at the airport waiting to board his flight when a woman sitting next to him opened a package of trail mix which included nuts.  Chelini says the mix spilled everywhere, including on himself.  He immediately went into anaphylaxis, and had to be rushed to the hospital where he received multiple shots of epinephrine.  One wonders what would have been the outcome of this exposure had he been on a plane at 35,000 feet.  No doubt, he would have been protected from this type of exposure had he been sitting in a buffer zone on an airplane.

One thing we know for certain is that no two allergies are alike, and no two reactions are alike.  We also know that when airlines take the proper precautions, onboard emergencies can be avoided and lives are protected.  Please take action now to create a safer flying environment for all passengers, because even one life lost to anaphylaxis is too many.

By: Amy Wicker

Your Stories

Summer 2015 –

Robin’s Story:  

Before taking a cross-country flight on American Airlines, Robin Van Duren went online to review the airline’s policy on food allergies.  The policy stated that the decision to make an announcement informing passengers about a nut allergy would be left up to crew members.  She was given the same information when she called to book her tickets.  Comfortable that she could get their cooperation, Van Duren bought tickets, arrived at the airport and informed the flight crew at check in.  Once on the airplane, after takeoff, the flight crew refused to make an announcement.  Crew members showed Van Duren their flight crew rule book indicating they could not make an announcement.  The policy shown and verbalized to Van Duren prior to departure differed greatly from what they were now being told.  “The flight attendant whispered to me that she understood how serious the problem was but that the airline had hired people to watch what the flight attendants do.  If she made an announcement she felt she would get fired,” said Van Duren.

To Van Duren and her family, it appeared as though the airline had different policies.  “We felt very unsafe, uncared for and discriminated against.  The gate people basically told us we fly at our own risk and if we don’t think it is safe, then don’t fly,” she said.  Van Duren now questions how they can fly safely when policies are not consistent.

A side note:  AllergySafeTravel has received numerous reports of flight attendants refusing to accommodate nut allergic passengers for fear of losing their jobs.  

Nancy’s Story

Nancy Myrick was caught in a nightmarish flying experience when she took her severely allergic 9-year-old son on a flight from Dallas to San Francisco. As was her custom, she asked if she could board early and wipe down her and her son’s seats in case they had peanut residue. The airline had let her do this on other flights, and since her son had had a reaction on a previous flight where no peanuts were visible, she knew it wasn’t an unreasonable precaution to take.

After some resistance and rude comments by suspicious flight attendants, the crew and ticket manager reluctantly let her board first so she could wipe the seats. Once they boarded, a girl next to them opened a bag of nuts. Myron suggested they move seats. When she asked a flight attendant if they could move, the crew member shot back: “Well, you can just get off the plane and get another flight.”

When the flight attendant called for the ticket manager to come back on the flight, she realized this wasn’t just a suggestion. In the meantime, the girl sitting near Myrick and her son had realized the issue and put away the peanuts, so Myrick suggested that they simply sit back in their original seats. But the ticket manager, refusing to hear anymore, told her to get off the plane.  “All I could do was get my things with my sobbing child and get off the plane.”  Myrick and her son were thrown off the plane very publicly and were told to wait at the doorway for 20 minutes. In the end, they were allowed to get back on board the plane while everyone watched. “I was afraid of missing a flight or getting arrested if I even raised my voice,” said Myrick.

By:  Alexander Nitkin

Airlines That Went Above and Beyond – WestJet

Summer 2015 –

When it comes to accommodating passengers flying with nut allergies, Canada’s WestJet Airlines has set the gold standard.   Since 2011, the company has operated under a unique, well-organized peanut and nut allergy-conscious policy.  The amount of information and detail that they provide passengers with is unparalleled.  From the filtration system to cabin cleaning and food manufacturing processes, WestJet aggressively addresses anything that might trigger on-board nut allergy reactions.    Notable guidelines from the policy include:

  • Carrying epinephrine auto-injectors on board all aircraft
  • Not serving nut-based products to customers (although the airline cannot guarantee that onboard snacks do not contain trace amounts).
  • Requesting that guests seated within two rows of an allergy sufferer not consume food products with nuts
  • Making a public address announcement prior to take-off informing all customers that they are traveling with a peanut or nut allergy sufferer, and asking them to refrain from opening or consuming peanuts or nuts during the flight.

We caught up with the Public Relations Manager for WestJet, Robert Palmer, via email to check in on the success of the four-year-old policy, and to see how Canadian travelers have responded to what might some might consider an inconvenience.

According to Palmer, in 2014, of the nearly 2,100 events on WestJet aircraft that required the services of MedAire, an in-flight medical services provider, only 56 of them were considered serious and allergy-related (about 2 percent). The majority of allergy-related incidents, Palmer said, appear to have been caused by food (usually consumed before boarding), bug or animal bites, interactions with pets or certain cleaning chemicals on board, as well as some miscellaneous cases. Most were treatable by antihistamine or similar medications. WestJet operates approximately 180,000 to 200,000 flights a year, serving about 20 million people.

Here are the highlights of the conversation Allergy Safe Travel had with Palmer:

Allergy Safe Travel: Has WestJet had to make any emergency landings due to allergy-related incidents since you put this policy in place? Have those occurred any less often since you implemented your policy?

Robert Palmer: No. To the best of our knowledge, we’ve never had to divert or make an emergency landing for an allergy-related event, although we do divert aircraft in cases where there are other potentially life-threatening medical emergencies on board (e.g.. heart attacks, strokes, etc.).

AST: What kind of response have you gotten from non-allergic customers regarding this policy? Are they mostly compliant in making sure allergy sufferers are in a safe environment?

RP:   Although we don’t “track” reactions to various policies, it would be difficult to assess with complete certainty the responses we’ve received. Anecdotally, I don’t think we’ve really had any response one way or another, but that is probably due to the fact that we do not serve nuts on our aircraft. Generally speaking, when I fly (50-75 times per year) I don’t see guests bringing them on board very often. This doesn’t surprise me, given the overall heightened public sensitivity around nut-related allergies. There may be some difference between Canada and the U.S. here, since some U.S. airlines still serve nuts and the overall public view may be different.

AST: Have you faced any backlash to this policy from customers? If so, could you describe a particular incident?

RP: No, not to my knowledge. Again, I believe Canadians are accustomed to this heightened awareness.

AST: Is WestJet incurring any sort of extra financial burden from being peanut/nut allergy-conscious?

RP: No, at least not directly. Our strict requirements for our vendors to adhere to our allergy approach likely create more expense for them, however.

AST: In general, is it difficult at any level of the company hierarchy (from executives to flight attendants) to implement such a policy? What are some of the challenges an airline faces when it decides to do so?

RP: WestJet’s corporate culture is one based on care and our approach to allergies is a natural extension of that culture. There was support at all levels of the company when we took this approach.

AST: Has the airline considered expanding this policy to be more accommodating for customers with other allergies?

RP: No, not at this time.

AST: Do you see WestJet as a model that other airlines should follow in this regard, and do you expect your competitors to follow suit with similar policies in the coming years?

RP: No one solution will fit every situation, and what one airline does may not necessarily work for another. We are pleased with our approach, but I wouldn’t feel comfortable suggesting that others should follow.

Palmer also wanted to add: “One trend I came across that I felt I should mention is the number of allergic guests who did not have their EpiPens with them on board. I was surprised to see how often these guests had put them in their checked baggage, which is obviously not accessible while in flight, rather than in their carry-on baggage. We always recommend that guests who require (or may require) medication always keep it with them.”

WestJet’s full policy can be read at the following link:

By:  Andrew Brown

Aimee: Our Hero in the Sky

Summer 2015 –

We salute American Airlines flight attendant Aimee of New York for going above and beyond to protect food allergic passengers.  Aimee, who frequently flies internationally, explains to her food allergic passengers that she understands their issues, and she’ll do what she can to help them.  This includes informing passengers who are seated in nearby rows about the individual’s allergy.  Aimee says she’s never had push back from the other passengers, and the food allergic passenger is always appreciative of her efforts.

Aimee understands food allergies first-hand since her son is allergic to dairy and nuts.  She had hoped that she and her family would be able to take frequent trips around the world, but her son’s allergies make that difficult to do.

When it comes to flying with allergies, Aimee says it’s all in the approach you take with the flight crew. “Don’t act like it’s a panic situation.  When you get on the plane, pull a flight attendant aside and calmly explain the situation.  Make sure it’s not during a crazy time,” said Aimee.

This 20-year-veteran says she believes the airlines need to be proactive and work with their food allergic passengers.   “This is about passenger safety and making sure that everyone stays safe while flying,” said Aimee.

AST would like to note that Aimee wished to keep her identity anonymous due to company policies.  We appreciate her candor and hope that one day talking about  going above and beyond to protect an allergic passenger will be encouraged by airlines.  Thanks to Aimee for sharing her story. 

By: Amy Wicker